What’s in the new BP oil spill ban?

A new oil spill in Louisiana could have an impact on the U.S. economy and the U, but the ban is being debated by the oil industry.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a temporary ban on oil and gas activity in the Gulf of Mexico on Friday.

The EPA has also banned the sale of any oil products, including palm oil and safflower oils, and has also set a two-year limit on the amount of the chemicals that can be released from oil pipelines.

The ban applies to the oil and natural gas industry and to the transportation of crude oil and refined petroleum products.

The oil spill, which happened last summer, was the first time that crude oil was spilled in the United States in more than 30 years.

The spill occurred when a pipeline broke and spilled 1,700 barrels of crude into the Gulf.

“We’re very disappointed that we didn’t get a report on this,” Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., told The Washington Post.

“It’s one of the things that we’ve been waiting for a long time.”

The ban could affect up to a quarter of the industry’s annual revenue and may affect millions of people who rely on the oil business.

“The impact will be felt far beyond the Gulf Coast, because it’s not just the oil that will be impacted,” BP CEO Bob Dudley told the New York Times.

“In the short term, the impact will affect the energy industry and the businesses that depend on it, and in the long term, it will impact our reputation,” he added.

“And it will also have an immediate impact on jobs, as well.”

The EPA also plans to hold a public hearing on the ban later this month.

The agency has said that there was no evidence that any oil was released, and it said that it will take “immediate and effective steps” to stop oil spill contamination.

The American Petroleum Institute (API), a lobbying group for the oil companies, said that the ban will hurt the economy and create a “disincentive” for oil companies to invest in oil exploration.

“There’s not much in the pipeline,” API President David Brat said, according to the Washington Post, referring to the spill.

“I think this is going to do a lot of damage.”

The API has been lobbying the EPA on the issue, but EPA spokeswoman Kelly Poteet said that her agency had “never given the API a formal request to conduct an oil spill analysis.”

Poteett said that BP and other oil companies were “working to complete their own spill assessments.”

The oil industry has said in the past that the spill had nothing to do with the spill, saying that it happened in a wellhead that BP had installed in an area in the Marcellus Shale that BP was drilling.

“BP did not and will not have any responsibility or responsibility to anyone for the spill,” an ExxonMobil spokesperson said in a statement to The Washington Times.

The Associated Press reported that the EPA has determined that the oil spill caused an economic harm to the state of Louisiana, and BP will be subject to fines.

BP and ExxonMobil have both faced lawsuits from residents of Louisiana who say that they were affected by the spill and that BP knew of the potential damage to the Gulf ecosystem.

BP has been sued by the state in an attempt to block the release of the oil.

“These actions are an outrageous attack on Louisiana’s ability to address the climate crisis and protect the environment,” Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards said in his statement to the Associated Press.

“Our state is already dealing with an unprecedented amount of damage caused by this oil spill.

We will be taking immediate and effective actions to reduce our carbon footprint and restore the Gulf coast’s pristine environment.”